MAN vs MACHINE: PROVIDER DIRECTED vs PRECISION AUTOMATED CRITICAL CARE MANAGEMENT (PACC-MAN) IN A PORCINE MODEL OF DISTRIBUTIVE SHOCK.

BACKGROUND: Critical care management of shock is a labor-intensive process. Precision automated critical care management (PACC-MAN) is an automated closed-loop system incorporating physiologic and hemodynamic inputs to deliver interventions while avoiding excessive fluid or vasopressor administration. To understand PACC-MAN efficacy, we compared PACC-MAN to provider-directed management (PDM). We hypothesized that PACC-MAN would achieve equivalent resuscitation outcomes to PDM while maintaining normotension with lower fluid and vasopressor requirements. METHODS: Twelve swine underwent 30% controlled hemorrhage over 30 minutes, followed by 45 minutes of aortic occlusion to generate a vasoplegic shock state, transfusion to euvolemia, and randomization to PACC-MAN or PDM for 4.25 hours. Primary outcomes were total crystalloid volume, vasopressor administration, total time spent at hypotension (MAP <60 mmHg), and total number of interventions. RESULTS: Weight-based fluid volumes were similar between PACC-MAN and PDM, median and IQR are reported (73.1 mL/kg [59.0-78.7] vs. 87.1 mL/kg [79.4-91.8] p = 0.07). There was no statistical difference in cumulative norepinephrine (PACC-MAN: 33.4 mcg/kg [27.1-44.6] vs. PDM: 7.5 [3.3-24.2] mcg/kg, p = 0.09). The median percentage of time spent at hypotension was equivalent (PACC-MAN: 6.2% [3.6-7.4] and PDM: 3.1% [1.3-6.6], p = 0.23). Urine outputs were similar between PACC-MAN and PDM (14.0 mL/kg vs. 21.5 mL/kg, p = 0.13). CONCLUSION: Automated resuscitation achieves equivalent resuscitation outcomes to direct human intervention in this shock model. This study provides the first translational experience with the PACC-MAN system versus PDM.

Improving the precision of shock resuscitation by predicting fluid responsiveness with machine learning and arterial blood pressure waveform data.

Fluid bolus therapy (FBT) is fundamental to the management of circulatory shock in critical care but balancing the benefits and toxicities of FBT has proven challenging in individual patients. Improved predictors of the hemodynamic response to a fluid bolus, commonly referred to as a fluid challenge, are needed to limit non-beneficial fluid administration and to enable automated clinical decision support and patient-specific precision critical care management. In this study we retrospectively analyzed data from 394 fluid boluses from 58 pigs subjected to either hemorrhagic or distributive shock. All animals had continuous blood pressure and cardiac output monitored throughout the study. Using this data, we developed a machine learning (ML) model to predict the hemodynamic response to a fluid challenge using only arterial blood pressure waveform data as the input. A Random Forest binary classifier referred to as the ML fluid responsiveness algorithm (MLFRA) was trained to detect fluid responsiveness (FR), defined as a ≥ 15% change in cardiac stroke volume after a fluid challenge. We then compared its performance to pulse pressure variation, a commonly used metric of FR. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), confusion matrix metrics, and calibration curves plotting predicted probabilities against observed outcomes. Across multiple train/test splits and feature selection methods designed to assess performance in the setting of small sample size conditions typical of large animal experiments, the MLFRA achieved an average AUROC, recall (sensitivity), specificity, and precision of 0.82, 0.86, 0.62. and 0.76, respectively. In the same datasets, pulse pressure variation had an AUROC, recall, specificity, and precision of 0.73, 0.91, 0.49, and 0.71, respectively. The MLFRA was generally well-calibrated across its range of predicted probabilities and appeared to perform equally well across physiologic conditions. These results suggest that ML, using only inputs from arterial blood pressure monitoring, may substantially improve the accuracy of predicting FR compared to the use of pulse pressure variation. If generalizable, these methods may enable more effective, automated precision management of critically ill patients with circulatory shock.

Investigating the variability in pressure-volume relationships during hemorrhage and aortic occlusion.

Introduction: The pressure-volume (P-V) relationships of the left ventricle are the classical benchmark for studying cardiac mechanics and pumping function. Perturbations in the P-V relationship (or P-V loop) can be informative and guide the management of heart failure, hypovolemia, and aortic occlusion. Traditionally, P-V loop analyses have been limited to a single-beat P-V loop or an average of consecutive P-V loops (e.g., 10 cardiac cycles). While there are several algorithms to obtain single-beat estimations of the end-systolic and end-diastolic pressure-volume relations (i.e., ESPVR and EDPVR, respectively), there remains a need to better evaluate the variations in P-V relationships longitudinally over time. This is particularly important when studying acute and transient hemodynamic and cardiac events, such as active hemorrhage or aortic occlusion. In this study, we aim to investigate the variability in P-V relationships during hemorrhagic shock and aortic occlusion, by leveraging on a previously published porcine hemorrhage model. Methods: Briefly, swine were instrumented with a P-V catheter in the left ventricle of the heart and underwent a 25% total blood volume hemorrhage over 30 min, followed by either Zone 1 complete aortic occlusion (i.e., REBOA), Zone 1 endovascular variable aortic control (EVAC), or no occlusion as a control, for 45 min. Preload-independent metrics of cardiac performance were obtained at predetermined time points by performing inferior vena cava occlusion during a ventilatory pause. Continuous P-V loop data and other hemodynamic flow and pressure measurements were collected in real-time using a multi-channel data acquisition system. Results: We developed a custom algorithm to quantify the time-dependent variance in both load-dependent and independent cardiac parameters from each P-V loop. As expected, all pigs displayed a significant decrease in the end-systolic pressures and volumes (i.e., ESP, ESV) after hemorrhage. The variability in response to hemorrhage was consistent across all three groups. However, upon introduction of REBOA, we observed significantly high levels of variability in both load-dependent and independent cardiac metrics such as ESP, ESV, and the slope of ESPVR (Ees). For instance, pigs receiving REBOA experienced a 342% increase in ESP from hemorrhage, while pigs receiving EVAC experienced only a 188% increase. The level of variability within the EVAC group was consistently less than that of the REBOA group, which suggests that the EVAC group may be more supportive of maintaining healthier cardiac performance than complete occlusion with REBOA. Discussion: In conclusion, we successfully developed a novel algorithm to reliably quantify the single-beat and longitudinal P-V relations during hemorrhage and aortic occlusion. As expected, hemorrhage resulted in smaller P-V loops, reflective of decreased preload and afterload conditions; however, the cardiac output and heart rate were preserved. The use of REBOA and EVAC for 44 min resulted in the restoration of baseline afterload and preload conditions, but often REBOA exceeded baseline pressure conditions to an alarming level. The level of variability in response to REBOA was significant and could be potentially associated to cardiac injury. By quantifying each P-V loop, we were able to capture the variability in all P-V loops, including those that were irregular in shape and believe that this can help us identify critical time points associated with declining cardiac performance during hemorrhage and REBOA use.

Precision Automated Critical Care Management: Closed-loop critical care for the treatment of distributive shock in a swine model of ischemia-reperfusion.

BACKGROUND: Goal-directed blood pressure management in the intensive care unit can improve trauma outcomes but is labor-intensive. Automated critical care systems can deliver scaled interventions to avoid excessive fluid or vasopressor administration. We compared a first-generation automated drug and fluid delivery platform, Precision Automated Critical Care Management (PACC-MAN), to a more refined algorithm, incorporating additional physiologic inputs and therapeutics. We hypothesized that the enhanced algorithm would achieve equivalent resuscitation endpoints with less crystalloid utilization in the setting of distributive shock. METHODS: Twelve swine underwent 30% hemorrhage and 30 minutes of aortic occlusion to induce an ischemia-reperfusion injury and distributive shock state. Next, animals were transfused to euvolemia and randomized into a standardized critical care (SCC) of PACC-MAN or an enhanced version (SCC+) for 4.25 hours. SCC+ incorporated lactate and urine output to assess global response to resuscitation and added vasopressin as an adjunct to norepinephrine at certain thresholds. Primary and secondary outcomes were decreased crystalloid administration and time at goal blood pressure, respectively. RESULTS: Weight-based fluid bolus volume was lower in SCC+ compared with SCC (26.9 mL/kg vs. 67.5 mL/kg, p = 0.02). Cumulative norepinephrine dose required was not significantly different (SCC+: 26.9 µg/kg vs. SCC: 13.76 µg/kg, p = 0.24). Three of 6 animals (50%) in SCC+ triggered vasopressin as an adjunct. Percent time spent between 60 mm Hg and 70 mm Hg, terminal creatinine and lactate, and weight-adjusted cumulative urine output were equivalent. CONCLUSION: Refinement of the PACC-MAN algorithm decreased crystalloid administration without sacrificing time in normotension, reducing urine output, increasing vasopressor support, or elevating biomarkers of organ damage. Iterative improvements in automated critical care systems to achieve target hemodynamics in a distributive-shock model are feasible.

Automated partial resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta reduces blood loss and hypotension in a highly lethal porcine liver injury model.

BACKGROUND: Partial and intermittent resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (pREBOA and iREBOA, respectively) are lifesaving techniques designed to extend therapeutic duration, mitigate ischemia, and bridge patients to definitive hemorrhage control. We hypothesized that automated pREBOA balloon titration compared with automated iREBOA would reduce blood loss and hypotensive episodes over a 90-minute intervention phase compared with iREBOA in an uncontrolled liver hemorrhage swine model. METHODS: Twenty-four pigs underwent an uncontrolled hemorrhage by liver transection and were randomized to automated pREBOA (n = 8), iREBOA (n = 8), or control (n = 8). Once hemorrhagic shock criteria were met, controls had the REBOA catheter removed and received transfusions only for hypotension. The REBOA groups received 90 minutes of either iREBOA or pREBOA therapy. Surgical hemostasis was obtained, hemorrhage volume was quantified, and animals were transfused to euvolemia and then underwent 1.5 hours of automated critical care. RESULTS: The control group had significantly higher mortality rate (5 of 8) compared with no deaths in both REBOA groups, demonstrating that the liver injury is highly lethal ( p = 0.03). During the intervention phase, animals in the iREBOA group spent a greater proportion of time in hypotension than the pREBOA group (20.7% [16.2-24.8%] vs. 0.76% [0.43-1.14%]; p < 0.001). The iREBOA group required significantly more transfusions than pREBOA (21.0 [20.0-24.9] mL/kg vs. 12.1 [9.5-13.9] mL/kg; p = 0.01). At surgical hemostasis, iREBOA had significantly higher hemorrhage volumes compared with pREBOA (39.2 [29.7-44.95] mL/kg vs. 24.7 [21.6-30.8] mL/kg; p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Partial REBOA animals spent significantly less time at hypotension and had decreased transfusions and blood loss. Both pREBOA and iREBOA prevented immediate death compared with controls. Further refinement of automated pREBOA is necessary, and controller algorithms may serve as vital control inputs for automated transfusion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.

Hardware and software implementation of POCT1-A for integration of point of care testing in research.

Point of care testing (POCT) is increasingly utilized in clinical medicine. Small, portable testing devices can now deliver reliable and accurate diagnostic results during a patient encounter. With these increases in POCT, the issue of data and results management quickly emerges. Results need to be cataloged accurately and efficiently while the providers/support staff are simultaneously managing patient encounters. The integration of electronic medical records (EMR) as data repositories requires that point of care testing data imports automatically into the EMR. POCT1-A was developed as a standard communication language for POCT device manufacturers to streamline automatic data import integration. While all modern POCT devices are built with this connectivity, the systems that provide the integration layer are often proprietary and require a fee for service. In the research environment, there is not enough throughput to justify the practical investment in these data management architectures. Moreover, researcher needs are different and unique compared to data management systems for clinicians. To meet this need, we developed a novel hardware and software connectivity solution using commercially available components to automate data management from a point-of-care blood biochemical analyzer during a critical care study in the preclinical research environment.

Development of a computational fluid dynamic model to investigate the hemodynamic impact of REBOA.

Background: Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is a lifesaving intervention for major truncal hemorrhage. Balloon-tipped arterial catheters are inserted via the femoral artery to create a temporary occlusion of the aorta, which minimizes the rate of internal bleeding until definitive surgery can be conducted. There is growing concern over the resultant hypoperfusion and potential damage to tissues and organs downstream of REBOA. To better understand the acute hemodynamic changes imposed by REBOA, we developed a three-dimensional computational fluid dynamic (CFD) model under normal, hemorrhage, and aortic occlusion conditions. The goal was to characterize the acute hemodynamic changes and identify regions within the aortic vascular tree susceptible to abnormal flow and shear stress. Methods: Hemodynamic data from established porcine hemorrhage models were used to build a CFD model. Swine underwent 20% controlled hemorrhage and were randomized to receive a full or partial aortic occlusion. Using CT scans, we generated a pig-specific aortic geometry and imposed physiologically relevant inlet flow and outlet pressure boundary conditions to match in vivo data. By assuming non-Newtonian fluid properties, pressure, velocity, and shear stresses were quantified over a cardiac cycle. Results: We observed a significant rise in blood pressure (∼147 mmHg) proximal to REBOA, which resulted in increased flow and shear stress within the ascending aorta. Specifically, we observed high levels of shear stress within the subclavian arteries (22.75 Pa). Alternatively, at the site of full REBOA, wall shear stress was low (0.04 ± 9.07E-4 Pa), but flow oscillations were high (oscillatory shear index of 0.31). Comparatively, partial REBOA elevated shear levels to 84.14 ± 19.50 Pa and reduced flow oscillations. Our numerical simulations were congruent within 5% of averaged porcine experimental data over a cardiac cycle. Conclusion: This CFD model is the first to our knowledge to quantify the acute hemodynamic changes imposed by REBOA. We identified areas of low shear stress near the site of occlusion and high shear stress in the subclavian arteries. Future studies are needed to determine the optimal design parameters of endovascular hemorrhage control devices that can minimize flow perturbations and areas of high shear.

Endovascular Perfusion Augmentation After Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta Improves Renal Perfusion and Decreases Vasopressors.

INTRODUCTION: Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) causes a severe ischemia-reperfusion injury. Endovascular Perfusion Augmentation for Critical Care (EPACC) has emerged as a hemodynamic/mechanical adjunct to vasopressors and crystalloid for the treatment of post-REBOA ischemia-reperfusion injury. The objective of the study is to examine the impact of EPACC as a tool for a wean from complete REBOA compared to standard resuscitation techniques. METHODS: Nine swine underwent anesthesia and then a controlled 30% blood volume hemorrhage with 30 min of supraceliac total aortic occlusion to create an ischemia-reperfusion injury. Animals were randomized to standardized critical care (SCC) or 90 min of EPACC followed by SCC. The critical care phase lasted 270 min after injury. Hemodynamic markers and laboratory values of ischemia were recorded. RESULTS: During the first 90 min the intervention phase SCC spent 60% (54%-73%) and EPACC spent 91% (88%-92%) of the time avoiding proximal hypotension (<60 mm Hg), P = 0.03. There was also a statistically significant decrease in cumulative norepinephrine dose at the end of the experiment between SCC (80.89 mcg/kg) versus EPACC (22.03 mcg/kg), P = 0.03. Renal artery flow during EPACC was similar compared to SCC during EPACC, P = 0.19. But during the last hour of the experiment (after removal of aortic balloon) the renal artery flow in EPACC (2.9 mL/kg/min) was statistically significantly increased compared to SCC (1.57 mL/min/kg), P = 0.03. There was a statistically significant decrease in terminal creatinine in the EPACC (1.7 mg/dL) compared to SCC (2.1 mg/dL), P = 0.03. CONCLUSIONS: The 90 min of EPACC as a weaning adjunct in the setting of a severe ischemia-reperfusion injury after complete supraceliac REBOA provides improved renal flow with improvement in terminal creatinine compared to SCC with stabilized proximal hemodynamics and decreased vasopressor dose.

Near-Infrared Spectroscopy for Determination of Cardiac Output Augmentation in a Swine Model of Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury.

CONTEXT: Near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) is a noninvasive tool for assessing local oxygen balance. In circulatory shock, the microcirculatory environment as measured by NIRS during resuscitation may provide additional diagnostic tools of value to the critical care physician. HYPOTHESIS: To assess whether a relative increase in peripheral NIRS was correlated with a clinically relevant increase in cardiac output following a fluid bolus in a swine model of shock. METHODS AND MODELS: Nine healthy young adult swine with median weight 80 kg (interquartile range, 75-83 kg) were anesthetized and surgically instrumented. They underwent a controlled hemorrhage of 20% of their blood volume followed by partial or complete aortic occlusion to create a variable ischemia-reperfusion injury. Next, the animals underwent four 500-mL plasmalyte boluses over 9 minutes each followed by a 6-minute pause. The animal then underwent a 25% mixed auto/homologous blood transfusion followed by four more 500 mL plasmalyte boluses over 9 minutes. Finally, the animals underwent a 25% mixed auto/homologous blood transfusion followed by an additional four rounds of 500-mL plasmalyte boluses over 9 minutes. Left thoracic limb NIRS, descending thoracic aortic flow (dAF), arterial blood pressure (MAP), central venous pressure (CVP), and mixed central venous oxygen saturation (Svo2) were measured continuously for comparison. RESULTS: The area under the receiver operating curve for an increase in dAF of 10% in response to a 500 mL bolus based on a percent increase in the proximal NIRS was 0.82 with 95% CI, 0.72-0.91; Svo2, 0.86 with 95% CI, 0.78-0.95; MAP, 0.75 with 95% CI, 0.65-0.85 and CVP, 0.64 with 95% CI, 0.53-0.76. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: A dynamic relative increase in NIRS in response to a crystalloid challenge has moderate discriminatory power for cardiac output augmentation during shock in a swine model of ischemia-reperfusion injury. NIRS performed as well as invasive measurements (Svo2 and MAP) and better than CVP.

Closed-loop automated critical care as proof-of-concept study for resuscitation in a swine model of ischemia-reperfusion injury.

BACKGROUND: Volume expansion and vasopressors for the treatment of shock is an intensive process that requires frequent assessments and adjustments. Strict blood pressure goals in multiple physiologic states of shock (traumatic brain injury, sepsis, and hemorrhagic) have been associated with improved outcomes. The availability of continuous physiologic data is amenable to closed-loop automated critical care to improve goal-directed resuscitation. METHODS: Five adult swine were anesthetized and subjected to a controlled 30% estimated total blood volume hemorrhage followed by 30 min of complete supra-celiac aortic occlusion and then autotransfusion back to euvolemia with removal of aortic balloon. The animals underwent closed-loop critical care for 255 min after removal of the endovascular aortic balloon. The closed-loop critical care algorithm used proximal aortic pressure and central venous pressure as physiologic input data. The algorithm had the option to provide programmatic control of pumps for titration of vasopressors and weight-based crystalloid boluses (5 ml/kg) to maintain a mean arterial pressure between 60 and 70 mmHg. RESULTS: During the 255 min of critical care the animals experienced hypotension (< 60 mmHg) 15.3% (interquartile range: 8.6-16.9%), hypertension (> 70 mmHg) 7.7% (interquartile range: 6.7-9.4%), and normotension (60-70 mmHg) 76.9% (interquartile range: 76.5-81.2%) of the time. Excluding the first 60 min of the critical care phase the animals experienced hypotension 1.0% (interquartile range: 0.5-6.7%) of the time. Median intervention rate was 8.47 interventions per hour (interquartile range: 7.8-9.2 interventions per hour). The proportion of interventions was 61.5% (interquartile range: 61.1-66.7%) weight-based crystalloid boluses and 38.5% (interquartile range: 33.3-38.9%) titration of vasopressors. CONCLUSION: This autonomous critical care platform uses critical care adjuncts in an ischemia-reperfusion injury model, utilizing goal-directed closed-loop critical care algorithm and device actuation. This description highlights the potential for this approach to deliver nuanced critical care in the ICU environment, thereby optimizing resuscitative efforts and expanding capabilities through cognitive offloading. Future efforts will focus on optimizing this platform through comparative studies of inputs, therapies, and comparison to manual critical care.

Automated aortic endovascular balloon volume titration prevents re-arrest immediately after return of spontaneous circulation in a swine model of nontraumatic cardiac arrest.

Objectives: Endovascular aortic occlusion as an adjunct to cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for non-traumatic cardiac arrest is gaining interest. In a recent clinical trial, return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was achieved despite prolonged no-flow times. However, 66% of patients re-arrested upon balloon deflation. We aimed to determine if automated titration of endovascular balloon volume following ROSC can augment diastolic blood pressure (DBP) to prevent re-arrest. Methods: Twenty swine were anesthetized and placed into ventricular fibrillation (VF). Following 7 minutes of no-flow VF and 5 minutes of mechanical CPR, animals were subjected to complete aortic occlusion to adjunct CPR. Upon ROSC, the balloon was either deflated steadily over 5 minutes (control) or underwent automated, dynamic adjustments to maintain a DBP of 60 mmHg (Endovascular Variable Aortic Control, EVAC). Results: ROSC was obtained in ten animals (5 EVAC, 5 REBOA). Sixty percent (3/5) of control animals rearrested while none of the EVAC animals rearrested (p = 0.038). Animals in the EVAC group spent a significantly higher proportion of the post-ROSC period with a DBP > 60 mmHg [median (IQR)] [control 79.7 (72.5-86.0)%; EVAC 97.7 (90.8-99.7)%, p = 0.047]. The EVAC group had a statistically significant reduction in arterial lactate concentration [7.98 (7.4-8.16) mmol/L] compared to control [9.93 (8.86-10.45) mmol/L, p = 0.047]. There were no statistical differences between the two groups in the amount of adrenaline (epinephrine) required. Conclusion: In our swine model of cardiac arrest, automated aortic endovascular balloon titration improved DBP and prevented re-arrest in the first 20 minutes after ROSC.

The physiology of aortic flow and pressures during partial resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in a swine model of hemorrhagic shock.

BACKGROUND: Partial resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) has shown promise as a method to extend REBOA, but there lacks a standard definition of the technique. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationships between distal and proximal mean arterial pressure (MAP) and distal aortic flow past a REBOA catheter. We hypothesize that a relationship between distal aortic flow and distal MAP in Zone 1 partial REBOA (pREBOA) is conserved and that there is no apparent relationship between aortic flow and proximal MAP. METHODS: A retrospective data analysis of swine was performed. Cohort 1 underwent 20% controlled hemorrhage and then randomized to aortic flow of 400 mL/min or complete occlusion for 20 minutes (n = 11). Cohort 2 underwent 30% controlled hemorrhage followed by complete aortic occlusion for 30 minutes (n = 29). Then, they all underwent REBOA wean in a similar stepwise fashion. Blood pressure was collected from above (proximal) and below (distal) the REBOA balloon. Aortic flow was measured using a surgically implanted supraceliac aortic perivascular flow probe. The time period of balloon wean was taken as the time point of interest. RESULTS: A linear relationship between distal MAP and aortic flow was observed ( R2 value, 0.80), while no apparent relationship appeared between proximal MAP and aortic flow ( R2 value, 0.29). The repeated-measures correlation coefficient for distal MAP (0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.94-0.94) was greater than proximal MAP (-0.73; 95% confidence interval, -0.74 to -0.72). CONCLUSION: The relationship between MAP and flow will be a component of next-generation pREBOA control inputs. This study provides evidence that pREBOA techniques should rely on distal rather than proximal MAP for control of distal aortic flow. These data could inform future inquiry into optimal flow rates and parameters based on distal MAP in both translational and clinical contexts.

Endovascular Perfusion Augmentation for Critical Care Decreases Vasopressor Requirements while Maintaining Renal Perfusion.

BACKGROUND: Ischemia reperfusion injury causes a profound hyperdynamic distributive shock. Endovascular perfusion augmentation for critical care (EPACC) has emerged as a hemodynamic adjunct to vasopressors and crystalloid. The objective of this study was to examine varying levels of mechanical support for the treatment of ischemiareperfusion injury in swine. METHODS: Fifteen swine underwent anesthesia and then a controlled 30% blood volume hemorrhage followed by 30 min of supra-celiac aortic occlusion to create an ischemia-reperfusion injury Animals were randomized to standardized critical care (SCC), EPACC with low threshold (EPACC-Low), and EPACC with high threshold (EPACC-High). The intervention phase lasted 270 min after injury Hemodynamic markers and laboratory values of ischemia were recorded. RESULTS: During the intervention phase, SCC spent 82.4% of the time avoiding proximal hypotension (>60 mm Hg), while EPACC-Low spent 97.6% and EPACC-High spent 99.5% of the time avoiding proximal hypotension, P  < 0.001. Renal artery flow was statistically increased in EPACC-Low compared with SCC (2.29 mL/min/kg vs. 1.77 mL/ min/kg, P  < 0.001), while renal flow for EPACC-High was statistically decreased compared with SCC (1.25 mL/min/kg vs. 1.77 mL/min/kg, P  < 0.001). EPACC animals required less intravenous norepinephrine, (EPACC-Low: 16.23mcg/kg and EPACC-High: 13.72 mcg/kg), compared with SCC (59.45 mcg/kg), P = 0.049 and P = 0.013 respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with SCC, EPACC-High and EPACC-Low had decreased norepinephrine requirements with decreased frequency of proximal hypotension. EPACC-Low paradoxically had increased renal perfusion despite having a mechanical resistor in the aorta proximal to the renal arteries. This is the first description of low volume mechanical hemodynamic support in the setting of profound shock from ischemia-reperfusion injury in swine demonstrating stabilized proximal hemodynamics and augmented distal perfusion.

Maintaining Zone 1 Occlusion is a Dynamic Process: The Effects of Proximal Pressure and Blood Transfusion During REBOA.

BACKGROUND: Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) provides hemodynamic support to patients with non-compressible truncal hemorrhage. As cardiac output increases due to aortic occlusion (AO), aortic diameter will increase as a function of compliance, potentially causing unintended flow around the balloon. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Swine (N = 10) were instrumented to collect proximal mean arterial blood pressure (pMAP), distal MAP (dMAP), balloon pressure (bP), balloon volume (bV), and distal aortic flow (Qaorta). A 7-Fr automated REBOA catheter was positioned in Zone 1. At T0, animals underwent 30% total blood volume hemorrhage over 30 min followed by balloon inflation to complete AO. Automated balloon inflation occurred from T30-T60 when Qaorta was detected. Period of interest was T55-T60, while the balloon actively worked to maintain AO during transfusion of shed blood. RESULTS: Median weight of the cohort was 73.75 [IQR:71.58-74.45] kg. During T40-T55 and T55-T60, median pMAP was 88.95 [IQR:76.80-109.92] and 108.13 [IQR:99.13-119.51] mmHg, P = 0.07. Median Qaorta during T40-T55, and T55-T60 was 0.81 [IQR:0.41-0.96], and 1.53 [IQR:1.07-1.96] mL/kg/min, P = 0.06. Median number of balloon inflations during T40-T55 was 0.00 [IQR:0.00-0.75] and increased during active transfusion to 10.00 [IQR:5.25-14.00], P = 0.001. DISCUSSION: In clinical practice, following initial establishment of AO, progressive balloon inflations are required to maintain AO in response to intrinsic and transfusion-mediated increases in cardiac output, blood pressure, and aortic diameter.

Unmasking the Confounder: The Inherent Physiologic Variability of Swine During an Automated Experimental Model of Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury.

BACKGROUND: We sought to determine the magnitude of the inherent inter-animal physiologic variability by automating a porcine Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) protocol to minimize external influences that might alter physiology and confound experimental results. METHODS: Swine (n = 42) underwent a controlled 30% blood volume hemorrhage followed by 30 minutes of REBOA (ie, ischemic phase). The animals were weaned from REBOA autonomously over 15 minutes, beginning the reperfusion phase, while continuing to provide partial flow balloon support to maintain a target proximal mean arterial pressure (pMAP) of 65 mmHg. Simultaneously, shed blood was re-transfused as part of the resuscitation efforts. Physiologic data were continuously recorded, and serum samples were serially collected. Baseline characteristics, variance in vital signs, and 8-isoprostane levels were quantified during hemorrhage, REBOA, and reperfusion phases. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in baseline physiology across animals (P > .05). Hemodynamic variability was highest for pMAP during the ischemic phase (P = .001) and for distal mean arterial pressure (dMAP) during the weaning/reperfusion phase (P = .001). The latter finding indicated the variable physiologic response to ischemia-reperfusion injury, as the automated balloon support required by each animal to maintain pMAP was highly variable. Circulating 8-isoprostane variance was significantly higher following the start of reperfusion compared to baseline levels (P = .001). DISCUSSION: Despite subjecting animals to a highly consistent ischemia-reperfusion injury through automation, we noted significant variability in the hemodynamic and biochemical response. These findings illustrate the inherent physiologic variability and potential limitations of porcine large animal models for the study of shock.

Arteriovenous Fistula Versus Graft Access Strategy in Older Adults Receiving Hemodialysis: A Pilot Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether surgical placement of an arteriovenous (AV) fistula (AVF) confers substantial clinical benefits over an AV graft (AVG) in older adults with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). We report vascular access outcomes of a pilot clinical trial. STUDY DESIGN: Pilot randomized parallel-group open-label trial. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Patients 65 years and older with ESKD and no prior AV access receiving maintenance hemodialysis through a tunneled central venous catheter referred for AV access placement by their treating nephrologist. INTERVENTION: Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to surgical placement of an AVG or AVF. OUTCOMES: Index AV access primary failure, successful cannulation, adjuvant interventions and infections. RESULTS: Of 122 older adults receiving hemodialysis and no prior AV access surgery, 24% died before (n = 18) or were too sick for (n = 11) referral for a permanent AV access. Of 46 eligible patients, 36 (78%) consented and were randomly assigned to AVG (n = 18) and AVF (n = 18) placement, of whom 13 (72%) and 16 (89%) underwent index AV access surgical placement, respectively. At a median follow-up of 321.0 days, primary AV access failure was noted in 31% in each group. The proportion of patients with successful cannulation was 62% (8 of 13) in the AVG and 50% (8 of 16) in the AVF group; median times to successful cannulation were 75.0 and 113.5 days, respectively. Endovascular procedures were recorded in 38% and 44%, and surgical reinterventions, in 23% and 25%, respectively. AV access infection was seen in 3 (23%) and 2 (13%) patients, respectively. LIMITATIONS: Small sample size precludes statistical inference. CONCLUSIONS: Almost one-quarter of older adults with incident ESKD and a central venous catheter as primary access were not referred for AV access placement due to medical reasons. Based on these limited results, there is little reason to favor either an AVF or AVG in this population until results from a larger randomized clinical trial become available. FUNDING: Government funding to an author (Dr Murea is supported by National Institutes of Health∖National Institute on Aging grant 1R03 AG060178-01). TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03545113.

Evaluation of Neuropathy, Glycemic Control, and Revascularization as Risk Factors for Future Lower Extremity Amputation among Diabetic Patients.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus is a major risk factor for progression to lower extremity amputation (LEA) due to progressive neuropathy and glycemia-induced vasculopathy. In this study, we evaluated risk factors for incident LEA type 2 diabetics during a randomized controlled trial and extended post-trial follow-up. METHODS: The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes trial randomized 10,251 type 2 diabetics to intensive glycemic control (Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) target <6.0%) versus standard glycemic control (HbA1c target 7.0-7.9%). Using backward elimination logistic regression models, we examined relationships between neuropathy using the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI) and glycemic control and incident LEA during the clinical trial and subsequent follow-up. RESULTS: 9,746 patients were followed for a mean of 7.9 +/-3.1 (median 8.9) years after randomization. Ninety-eight (1%) participants underwent an incident LEA during the trial or post-trial follow-up period. Baseline demographics and traditional risk factors were examined by incident amputation status. Multivariable models revealed that abnormal 10 gm filament test (HR 4.50, 95% CI 2.92-6.95, P < 0.0001), presence of ulceration (HR 4.22, 95% CI 1.65-10.8, P = 0.0004), abnormal appearance on foot examination (HR 4.75, 95% CI 2.30-9.83, P < 0.0001), and mean postrandomization HbA1c (HR 1.65, 95% CI 1.35-2.00, P < 0.0001) were strongly predictive of LEA when accounting for other common risk factors for amputation. CONCLUSIONS: In this post hoc analysis of a large randomized controlled population of diabetic patients, we found that components of the MNSI score including presence of ulceration, abnormal appearance of the foot, and 10 gm filament monofilament scoring were strongly predictive of LEA. This adds a valuable clinical tool in the risk stratification of diabetic patients for LEA.

Automated Partial Versus Complete Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta for the Management of Hemorrhagic Shock in a Pig Model of Polytrauma: a Randomized Controlled Pilot Study.

INTRODUCTION: Endovascular variable aortic control (EVAC) is an automated partial resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) platform designed to mitigate the deleterious effects of complete REBOA. Long-term experiments are needed to assess potential benefits. The feasibility of a 24-hour experiment in a complex large animal trauma model remains unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Anesthetized swine were subjected to controlled hemorrhage, blunt thoracic trauma, and tibial fractures. Animals were then randomized (N = 3/group) to control (No balloon support), 90 minutes of complete supraceliac REBOA, or 10 minutes of supraceliac REBOA followed by 80 minutes of EVAC. One hundred ten minutes after injury, animals were resuscitated with shed blood, the REBOA catheter was removed. Automated critical care under general anesthesia was maintained for 24 hours. RESULTS: Animals in the control and EVAC groups survived to the end of the experiment. Animals in the REBOA group survived for 120, 130, and 660 minutes, respectively. Animals in the EVAC group displayed similar mean arterial pressure and plasma lactate concentration as the control group by the end of the experiment. Histologic analysis suggested myocardial injury in the REBOA group when compared with controls. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the feasibility of intermediate-term experiments in a complex swine model of polytrauma with 90 minutes of REBOA. EVAC may be associated with improved survival at 24 hours when compared with complete REBOA. EVAC resulted in normalized physiology after 24 hours, suggesting that prolonged partial occlusion is possible. Longer studies evaluating partial REBOA strategies are needed.